Really! I never thought of myself as a perv. I mean, sure, I'm adventurous, but in a relatively mundane kind of way. Until I was watching "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" the other night. Then I realized that I MUST be a pervert. There's no other explanation for it. I can deal with getting hot bothered by a 21 year old who looks sexy as all get out. Especially when he's naked, even if it is with a horse. And even when he does get a bit of the hamster penis.
I mean, normally it's not so... unimpressive. It must have been cold on that stage. No, it *wasn't* necessary to show you these, but to be honest, I just really wanted to post more pictures of Daniel Radcliffe's penis, sorry. Nothing wrong with that, right? I mean, even small it's a pretty nice penis. And he IS an adult. But... well...
You see, like I said, I was watching the first movie the other day. How do I go from THIS:
hot, ripped, well endowed... Drool-worthy... To this?? 
And not feel completely skeevy??? I mean, he was adorable! And so, so young. And so not hot and drool-worthy. Thankfully. I mean, if I DID find him hot, there'd REALLY be something wrong with me. At least when he's 21 I can't get in trouble.
*Sigh* Am I the only one who is so torn by this? Given the number of people who find my blog because they're searching for Daniel Radcliffe's penis, I can't be the only one who has the hots for him. But I feel like I'm in the minority for feeling guilty about it.
I sometimes feel guilty over things like this. Don't worry. You are only looking a photo he gave permission for.
It's not like you are flying to England and hiding outside his bathroom window to take photos of him. You haven't have you?
But I do think its a bit weird that you made this a search term. :)
Posted by: Olivia | 10/06/2009 at 02:38 AM
No, no, I don't actually want to DEAL with a 21 year old. I just think he's hot.
I made it a search term because I get between 10 and 20 hits A DAY about his penis. It seemed a good idea. ;))
Posted by: The Queen of the Blog | 10/06/2009 at 07:59 AM
I don't think Daniel Radcliffe is hot. And after reading your post, it seems it has saved me a lot of worries :-P
Posted by: Gissel | 10/08/2009 at 01:54 AM
I should probably clarify this a bit better... He's flat out too young for me. But he definitely gets better with age. And I wouldn't mind a temporary shack up in about 15 years. I mean, I could tell back when he was 14 that he was going to make a fine looking man. I like him. And it does make me feel skeevy. But even if he threw himself at me RIGHT NOW, I'd feel a little weird with him being 21.
Posted by: The Queen of the Blog | 10/08/2009 at 07:18 AM
http://www.dailydemotivators.com/the-rock-demotivator/
Posted by: jtlitch | 01/25/2010 at 07:15 AM
He's hot. Now. All hot guys had to start somewhere. Someday some little skanky chicks are going to think my baby boys are hot. I'll hate them.
As for us, it's totally normal. It's not like I was a potterphile when the kid was 12.
Well played.
Posted by: Jessi | 08/15/2010 at 12:55 AM
LOL Thanks, Jessi. You're right -- I didn't feel even a twinge of lust when he was 12. I just saw a cute kid and thought he was a cute kid. But my, oh, my, has he not turned into someone so worth lusting over. I think I may just have a thing for British men. I mean, David Tennant?? Mmmm! I think there's another blog post in there somewhere...
Why doesn't it bother me that girls will find my son hot when he's older? I mean, the kid's 5 1/2 and he's buff (in a 5 1/2 year old kind of way, don't get me wrong), and you can kind of see the man he'll become. I WANT girls to think he's hot as he gets older. UW was a nerd when he was a kid. I'd rather The Boy be hot than a nerd. ;)
Posted by: The Queen of the Blog | 08/15/2010 at 07:23 AM